wellinghall: (Grace)
wellinghall ([personal profile] wellinghall) wrote2009-12-20 09:41 am
Entry tags:

Films and TV

I seem to have been watching TV with an unusual eye for detail recently.

Yesterday, in watching the early Fred Astaire / Ginger Rogers film Roberta, I spotted two scenes that were very clearly picked up in Singing in the Rain. And then watching the first part of Love Actually, I spotted Marcus Brigstock. I hadn't seen either of these on previous viewings.

In the Sherlock Holmes Blue Carbuncle story yesterday, there was an error (by the programme makers, not by Holmes or Conan Doyle - although these do exist in the books!) Holmes was drawing inferences about a hat's wearer from the condition of its lining - which, when we caught a glimpse of it, looked far too fresh.

And in a recent Poirot, there was one definite continuity error (his bow tie changed in a scene, then changed back); and a possible one (the same programme seemed to be set in both 1932 and 1936).

ETA: Which reminds me of a note in Unfinished Tales which I doubted. I will dig it out.

[identity profile] miss-next.livejournal.com 2009-12-20 09:59 am (UTC)(link)
I bet Mole would like a bow tie like that. :-)

[identity profile] parrot-knight.livejournal.com 2009-12-20 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)
The main run of television Poirots in the Hastings-Japp-Miss Lemon era were all set in one year, according to the documentary which is sometimes wheeled out alongside them on ITV3, but I can't remember which one it is. This was more a guide for designers, I think, than a story point strictly, though, and so could easily lead to contradictions.