wellinghall: (Default)
wellinghall ([personal profile] wellinghall) wrote2006-12-06 09:06 am
Entry tags:

Guess Who has just been named the best Doctor ever?

Cut so you can make a guess before you look at the answer:

Fans have named David Tennant the best ever Doctor Who in a poll, beating Tom Baker into second place.
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6211584.stm
ext_20923: (Default)

[identity profile] pellegrina.livejournal.com 2006-12-06 11:53 am (UTC)(link)
No kidding. I wonder how many in the poll constituency even had a sample of more than two Doctors to vote on! Not to mention that younger generations may be responding as much to the more familiar modern pacing and narrative style of New Who in their selection.

I used to say Tom Baker to this question, but am now inclined towards Patrick Troughton.
tree_and_leaf: Cartoon of Stephen on his back in water, reaching for lowered rope, caption "Which the Doctor's overboard again."   (O'Brian)

[personal profile] tree_and_leaf 2006-12-06 12:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I've only seen one Troughton story, but I was really impressed by it and him. It was the Invasion† - I may well get 'The Mind Robber' next.

Actually, I like all the doctors I've seen, but particularly Hartnell, Pertwee and Davison (I think it's the cricket !) Eccleston was pretty good, but I don't really like the format/ style of New Who - although having said that, the World War II two-parter was one of the best things I've seen on telly in ages. I'm suspending judgement on Tennant - I think he has great potential, but the script-writing last series was really disappointing.

† I was quite surprised by how much of that was recyled for the Ten Cybermen story - not the plot as a whole, but lots of minor details - including the use of mass communication devices, which seems very prescient of them.
ext_20923: (Default)

[identity profile] pellegrina.livejournal.com 2006-12-06 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Someone else who doesn't really like the format/style of New Who! [Swoons in delight]

Like you I was impressed with the WW2 two-parter - it's the only reason I continued watching, as I went into it feeling "right, if this episode still doesn't do it for me, I'm giving up on the show". It (OK, and Capt. Jack) kept me watching, and I stuck it out through season 2 largely because I didn't realize Jack wouldn't be in it... (Also a faint secret hope that they really would kill Rose, which is surely a bad attitude to have going into the season finale...!) Generally I found the New Who too rushed.

I never really warmed to Eccleston as they never really explored the aspects of that Doctor I found interesting (the war survivor stuff - I missed a number of eps, though). I initially preferred Tennant (to my utter surprise because I have never liked him in anything except Posh Nosh) until he seemed to degenerated into righteous ranting. I'll probably at least start watching series 3, if it's really Rose-free and Jack-containing! Torchwood I've been enjoying, though I've missed the last three.

[identity profile] parrot-knight.livejournal.com 2006-12-06 01:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I was just watching 'The Age of Steel' last night, now I have the DVD box set, and was remarking on how many details are recycled from 'The Invasion'. Fans of a certain vintage and die-hardness fussed over the borrowings from the CD story 'Spare Parts', which were acknowledged by the credit for Marc Platt at the end of both 'Rise of the Cybermen' and 'The Age of Steel', but the motifs from 'The Inasion' are more obvious, including the helicopter rescue scene and the presence of International Electromatics vans. I like the parallelling of cheap transistor radios in 'The Invasion' with 'Rise/Age' and its earpods, too.

I find Tennant too smug most of the time, but, acknowledging the argument that the Doctor is annoyingly chirpy as a way of boosting Rose's confidence in him, hope that this characteristic will be less obvious once the Doctor is accompanied by Martha.