[identity profile] colinbj.livejournal.com 2007-09-07 11:33 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks for this, it's of interest!

Speaking as an autistic physicist, I'm disappointed. I'd much rather believe that social cognition is an ancient instinctive skill, and the ability to understand physics the Great New Stride in evolution.

[identity profile] romancinger.livejournal.com 2007-09-07 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I found this one too. V interesting, and quite surprising I think - I would have thought a 2-year-old would equate to the apes in all things.
ext_189645: (Default)

[identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com 2007-09-07 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Um. I'm thinking that the children were being shown how to carry out the activity by a member of their own species, whereas the chimps and orangs were being asked to imitate human beings. Maybe it's easier to imitate your own species than a different one?

I also wonder how old the chimps and orangs were, and whether imitative behaviour may be influenced by age as well as species?

So, on the whole, I'm thinking fascinating but perhaps not quite in the way the news report suggests. Would have been interesting to hear how the Orangs and the chimps were different, too.