wellinghall (
wellinghall
) wrote
2009
-
08
-
23
11:14 am
Entry tags:
cricket
Cricket
Yes! A wicket for Broad!!!
ETA: And another wicket!
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 10:19 am (UTC)
(
link
)
two down, eight to go!
no subject
wellinghall.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 10:21 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Until five minutes ago, I was beginning to doubt whether we could do it ...
no subject
pellegrina.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 10:51 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You must be feeling like I did at the final match of the 2006 World Cup, except your match goes on for five days rather than 90 minutes. Who would be a cricket fan?!
no subject
wellinghall.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 10:52 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Well, me ... but it's not always good for the nerves!
no subject
the-marquis.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 11:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Nonsense its always good for the nerves; gives the wibbly things a dammned good work out ;-)
no subject
wellinghall.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 04:20 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
House-buying is enough for that!
no subject
the-marquis.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 11:04 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Come on how many other sports offer grace*, style, strategy, drinks intervals, a lunch break, and a tea break: all as part of the game.
*Especially if you read Stephen Fry's blog about Stuart Broad, well allowing for the crush he's obviously developed
no subject
wellinghall.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 04:14 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Come on how many other sports offer grace
Cricket had rather more of that in the nineteenth century ... ;-)
no subject
philmophlegm.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 08:02 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Oh, not the same at all! I mean this is only cricket. It's not ultimately that important. Not like football.
no subject
wellinghall.livejournal.com
2009-08-23 08:14 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I quite agre - they're not the same at all ...
10 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*Especially if you read Stephen Fry's blog about Stuart Broad, well allowing for the crush he's obviously developed
no subject
Cricket had rather more of that in the nineteenth century ... ;-)
no subject
no subject