wellinghall: (Cary)
wellinghall ([personal profile] wellinghall) wrote2009-11-06 07:29 pm
Entry tags:

GQ's most influential men

These are the top 10 "most influential men [in Britain] ... the result of exhaustive discussion between the GQ editors and a panel of independent judges."

1. David Cameron ("PM in waiting")
2. Lord Mandelson ("de facto head of government")
3. James Murdoch (Chairman and Chief Executive, News Corp Europe and Asia; Executive Chairman, News International)
4. George Osborne (Shadow Chancellor)
5. Rupert Murdoch (Chairman and Chief Executive, News Corporation)
6. Viscount Rothermere (Chairman, Daily Mail & General Trust)
7. Sir Philip Green (Owner, Arcadia Group)
8. Paul Dacre (Editor-in-Chief, Associated Newspapers)
9. Gordon Brown ("PM (until next year)")
10. Mervyn King (Governor, The Bank of England)

[identity profile] psychostace.livejournal.com 2009-11-06 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Crikey, there isn't one of those who isn't profoundly disturbing...

[identity profile] didiusjulianus.livejournal.com 2009-11-06 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Lol.

Did you mean Russell Brand?

I think he's quite witty and makes some half-decent observations, some of the time. He's quite well read, too. Although he does act like a prat sometimes too. Many men (or indeed, people) sleep with a lot of other people, not always in a potentially lasting relationship - surely they're not ALL morons?

[identity profile] didiusjulianus.livejournal.com 2009-11-06 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
TWO Murdochs out of 10 people is particularly so, IMO.
ext_20923: (raspberry)

[identity profile] pellegrina.livejournal.com 2009-11-06 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I think my reply to Wellinghall's poll was "Someone obnoxious" and this looks like ten of those. Though Mervyn King did say something sensible recently, didn't he?

[identity profile] didiusjulianus.livejournal.com 2009-11-07 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Mind you I see how he gets on people's nerves, esp after that thing with Jonathan Ross.

[identity profile] tigerfort.livejournal.com 2009-11-07 10:21 am (UTC)(link)
I'm mildly interested by their opinion that James M is more dangerousinfluential than his father; I'd had him down as essentially the local mouthpiece for the family. (ie, peddler/promoter for his father's influence rather than strictly influential himself.) But I might be wrong, and I do agree with [livejournal.com profile] pellegrina.

[identity profile] didiusjulianus.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I dunno. Did he?

[identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com 2009-11-09 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
I heard a mention on Radio 4 in the summer that James Murdoch was very much a man in his own right, and not just a mouthpiece for his father - but I can't remember just what was said. I'll see what GQ says about both of them (although it is just a few lines).

[identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com 2009-11-09 08:56 am (UTC)(link)
From what I have seen / heard, Mervyn King is a very sensible man. He is hindered by the tripartite system of regulation put in place by the current government, where bank regulation is shared between the Bank of England, the Financial Services Authority, and HM Treasury - but then, I didn't hear Mervyn King - or anyone else - complaining much about this before the crash.

[identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com 2009-11-09 08:57 am (UTC)(link)
See my comment to [livejournal.com profile] pellegrina just above.

[identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com 2009-11-09 08:57 am (UTC)(link)
But not really that unexpected, I think.

[identity profile] tigerfort.livejournal.com 2009-11-10 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Fairy nuff; I don't think I was doing anything other than assuming....