GQ's most influential men
Nov. 6th, 2009 07:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
These are the top 10 "most influential men [in Britain] ... the result of exhaustive discussion between the GQ editors and a panel of independent judges."
1. David Cameron ("PM in waiting")
2. Lord Mandelson ("de facto head of government")
3. James Murdoch (Chairman and Chief Executive, News Corp Europe and Asia; Executive Chairman, News International)
4. George Osborne (Shadow Chancellor)
5. Rupert Murdoch (Chairman and Chief Executive, News Corporation)
6. Viscount Rothermere (Chairman, Daily Mail & General Trust)
7. Sir Philip Green (Owner, Arcadia Group)
8. Paul Dacre (Editor-in-Chief, Associated Newspapers)
9. Gordon Brown ("PM (until next year)")
10. Mervyn King (Governor, The Bank of England)
1. David Cameron ("PM in waiting")
2. Lord Mandelson ("de facto head of government")
3. James Murdoch (Chairman and Chief Executive, News Corp Europe and Asia; Executive Chairman, News International)
4. George Osborne (Shadow Chancellor)
5. Rupert Murdoch (Chairman and Chief Executive, News Corporation)
6. Viscount Rothermere (Chairman, Daily Mail & General Trust)
7. Sir Philip Green (Owner, Arcadia Group)
8. Paul Dacre (Editor-in-Chief, Associated Newspapers)
9. Gordon Brown ("PM (until next year)")
10. Mervyn King (Governor, The Bank of England)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 09:33 pm (UTC)Did you mean Russell Brand?
I think he's quite witty and makes some half-decent observations, some of the time. He's quite well read, too. Although he does act like a prat sometimes too. Many men (or indeed, people) sleep with a lot of other people, not always in a potentially lasting relationship - surely they're not ALL morons?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:21 am (UTC)dangerousinfluential than his father; I'd had him down as essentially the local mouthpiece for the family. (ie, peddler/promoter for his father's influence rather than strictly influential himself.) But I might be wrong, and I do agree withno subject
Date: 2009-11-09 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-10 04:39 pm (UTC)