Date: 2009-01-21 09:43 pm (UTC)
I agree that the issue of employees for smoking-allowed pubs is a problem, and that I'm not sure there's an acceptable way to solve it. So to unpack a bit: assuming that there was an acceptable solution (robot bar-staff, perhaps ;) ) then I'd be happy with them; if the employee issue can't be solved acceptably, then I'd be worried for the same reasons you are. Partly, of course, the difficulty comes with drawing the line - after all, is it fair to insist that a fencing instructor must either enjoy fencing or put themselves at (admittedly much smaller) risk for someone else's habit? After all, people do get injured sometimes. (Granted it's much more unlikely that someone who doesn't enjoy fencing would want to become a fencing instructor than that someone who doesn't smoke would get a job in a bar, but the question is, in a sense, where between those two examples you draw the line....)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

wellinghall: (Default)
wellinghall

December 2023

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 03:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios