Page Summary
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eldritchhobbit.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
na-lon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gramarye1971 - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
beckyc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wryelle.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
beckyc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
the-marquis.livejournal.com - (no subject)
didiusjulianus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chris-maslen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chris-maslen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chris-maslen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wellinghall.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 08:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:29 pm (UTC)A good book on the anthropology of the English (I forget the author) says we have in fact 6 classes. Lower working, upper working, lower middle, middle middle, upper middle, upper. I think this is about right.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:11 pm (UTC)*What I was when I was growing up was middle middle class. Pretty much by definition, since both my parents were teachers and that's about as middle as you can get.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 08:28 pm (UTC)Looked up the defs before answering...as I now see, same answer as you gave yourself.
However, I think it is all a load of *******, for lots of reasons that I am too tired to talk about, but two that come to mind are that the socio-economic scale naturally puts younger people at the beginning of their careers in a lower banding (despite the fact that this takes no account of the 'socio-' bit), and that none of the scales I just looked at properly take account of people (often women but not necessarily) who do not fit into the traditional pattern of career progression due to other non-paying or non-career-oriented responsibilities/lifestyle choices.
Regardless of you being upper middle class and A-banded by definition, I stand by the original comment I made at the time too, (which wasn't *the* original comment).
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 08:50 pm (UTC)You'll have to remind me (on or off list).
no subject
Date: 2006-09-19 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-19 08:38 pm (UTC)I don't think we've met (unless you are a TS or SocT member?)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-20 08:16 pm (UTC)