Warning: may contain spoilers (but probably only small ones)
My thoughts on these subjects, in slightly more detail; but I'm writing from memory here, and I'll need to check the book to confirm some of this.
On rank, Naomi Novik seems to have made two mistakes. The first is having no rank between Lieutenant and post-Captain. Now, I do not think that the modern naval rank structure (with, I think, Lieutenant-Commander and Commander) necessarily applied two hundred years ago. However, I did think that not every (ship) captain necessarily had the exalted rank of (post) captain.
On weapons, she has her dragon-borne "men at arms" armed with rifles. Rifles were *very* new in those days, and I wonder if such new technology would have been adopted by the air force so quickly. Secondly, rifles then were very slow to load and fire; even if some were armed with rifles, it would make sense to also have some armed with the quicker, if less accurate, muskets.
Of course, there's nothing to say that her fictional world is just like the Real World, with added dragons; but these points do have the feel fo mistakes, rather than deliberate changes.
Comments from those better-versed in such matters would be welcome!
And while talking about the book - the blurb is so horrible as to make us suspect that it was written from an earlier draft of the book.
My thoughts on these subjects, in slightly more detail; but I'm writing from memory here, and I'll need to check the book to confirm some of this.
On rank, Naomi Novik seems to have made two mistakes. The first is having no rank between Lieutenant and post-Captain. Now, I do not think that the modern naval rank structure (with, I think, Lieutenant-Commander and Commander) necessarily applied two hundred years ago. However, I did think that not every (ship) captain necessarily had the exalted rank of (post) captain.
On weapons, she has her dragon-borne "men at arms" armed with rifles. Rifles were *very* new in those days, and I wonder if such new technology would have been adopted by the air force so quickly. Secondly, rifles then were very slow to load and fire; even if some were armed with rifles, it would make sense to also have some armed with the quicker, if less accurate, muskets.
Of course, there's nothing to say that her fictional world is just like the Real World, with added dragons; but these points do have the feel fo mistakes, rather than deliberate changes.
Comments from those better-versed in such matters would be welcome!
And while talking about the book - the blurb is so horrible as to make us suspect that it was written from an earlier draft of the book.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 10:54 am (UTC)One of the source below said that the rank of Commander was established in 1794, implying that prior to that date it was possible to proceed directly from Lieutenant to Post-Captain. The term Post-Captain denoted rank, whereas the unqualified term "captain" could be used for a commanding officer of any rank.
The position (not rank) of lieutenants-commander (the plural is deliberate) was, I think, introduced late 19th century. I don't have an RN history but I did find a couple of web references:
http://www.defence.gov.au/news/navynews/editions/2001/11_12_01/story20.htm
and
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:ISTuvU9QErMJ:www.jmr.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/conJmrArticle.52/viewPage/2+lieutenants-commander&hl=en&gl=au&ct=clnk&cd=12
(this is a cached portion of a subscription article)
And what is this book of which you write?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 12:15 pm (UTC)The other rank issue I picked up, but failed to comment on above, was that she seems to imply that ensigns were lower-ranking than midshipmen.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 06:21 pm (UTC)I'd have suggested carbines (as in cavalry) from having read Alan Mallinson's napoleonic-ish cavalry books.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 07:32 pm (UTC)Future officers joined the Navy as mid-shipmen usually in their teens. They needed a Captain to agree to take them, so money or connections were useful. At around 20 they were able to take an exam for promotion to Lieutenant. (It involved questions on navigation and ship-handling as well as battle tactics.)
Once you became a Lieutenant you joined the bottom of the list, seniority was defined by the date of your commission. First Lieutenant, for example wasn't a rank but a position, held by the most senior (earliest promoted) Lieutenant on board. Some ships (those smaller than a frigate) were commanded by Lieutenants. Their role was Commander but their rank was still Lieutenant. Some very small ships were commanded by Masters, who were warrant rather than commissioned officers - risen from the ranks.
The biggest jump was from Lieutenant to Post-Captain. It usually involved patronage or even luck - you could be the admiral's favourite or just be around when a new captain was needed. Again, you joined the bottom of the list and gained seniority as captains above you died and those below you were promoted. Live long enough and you would automatically make Admiral, as the lists were continuous.
It was a system heavily dependent on who you knew and Buggins turn, but it was easier for a able but not terribly wealthy man to make his way in the Navy than the Army of the same period - no buying and selling of commissions.
Sorry for the rambling detail, hope it makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 08:01 am (UTC)I don't think that Ensign was ever a Royal Navy rank. It is used in the USN as the lowest commissioned rank, between Midshipman and Lieutenant (Junior Grade) (which is Sublieutenant in RN/RAN), so if she is writing from a US background she's still wrong. It's even more wrong when you consider that Midshipmen in the USN are not commissioned officers, they are considered officer cadets. Midshipmen in the RAN are commissioned officers, even though their rank is equivalent to Officer Cadet in the Army and RAAF, and I guess the same would apply to the RN.
Ensign was formerly used in the British Army as the lowest commissioned rank but I believe it was replaced by 2nd Lieutenant (though I could be wrong).
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 01:52 pm (UTC)Midshipman: lollipop as it now looks (or napoleonic period style collar braid to button on white, but on a modern jacket collar ...)
Sub-Lieutenant: One ring. Lieutenant: Two rings.
Lieutenant-Commander: Two and a half rings.
Commander: Three rings and obe line of gold leaves on cap brim.
(And don't forget the pronunciation is still 18thC "Leftenant")
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 12:02 am (UTC)In Australia only the Army and Air Force ranks are pronounced "leff-tenant". The Navy types tend to say "l'tenant" (where the apostrophe stands for that unstressed shwah syllable usually represented by an upside-sown e).
no subject
Date: 2006-03-31 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-31 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-31 08:28 pm (UTC)They stand as prime examples of how not to do infodumps, both of the previous adventures of the characters and also the history of the areas they are sailing in. But I find the characters thoroughly engaging and the history interesting, so I tend overlook the writing.
It's also probably a good idea to read them in order, as characters are gradually added to on-going cast as time goes by.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-31 09:35 pm (UTC)