Date: 2007-08-12 01:15 pm (UTC)
ext_20923: (stoat)
From: [identity profile] pellegrina.livejournal.com
Uh... that would be an ecumenical matter?

Date: 2007-08-12 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
These stumps are very small, but those are far away...

Date: 2007-08-12 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrkinch.livejournal.com
I love technical language! Even more when it's explained.

It's more fun to learn about my friends' enthusiasms than be sheltered from them, but several attempts at explaining cricket to me have failed utterly.*g*

Date: 2007-08-12 02:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com
If the ball hits the wicket, the batsman is out.

If the ball hits the batsmans leg, and would otherwise have hit the wicket in the judgement of the empire, the batsman is out. This is known as Leg Before Wicket, or LBW.

This judgement is exercised without the use of any technical aids, although these (chiefly one known as Hawkeye) are available to TV audiences.

In the current England-India match, there have been several poor LBW decisions by the umpires.

Date: 2007-08-12 03:29 pm (UTC)
ext_20852: (Default)
From: [identity profile] alitalf.livejournal.com
When you explain it, it seems logical to automate the decision. My initial reaction was "use a what for what?"

Date: 2007-08-12 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
"in the judgement of the empire"

Typo or freudian slip?

Date: 2007-08-12 05:11 pm (UTC)

Date: 2007-08-12 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrkinch.livejournal.com
That's very clear, and an interesting example of what all sports grapple with, I think.

Date: 2007-08-12 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] romancinger.livejournal.com
I did know what you meant. And I think it is time; after all umpires only decided because there were no other aids!

Date: 2007-08-12 07:36 pm (UTC)
ext_27570: Richard in tricorn hat (Default)
From: [identity profile] sigisgrim.livejournal.com
Well they do pretty much the same in tennis and there is is a chance of inspecting the line where the ball is supposed to hit to see if it has been affected by any impact.

Whereas in cricket that are two things that are moving: the ball and the batsman's leg. That is much more difficult to judge.

Profile

wellinghall: (Default)
wellinghall

December 2023

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 04:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios