Date: 2010-12-31 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
I think the range of answers to the second question will bias the results. You should probably add quite a few more onto the bottom, so that the range of answers goes up at least as far as 7,000. I voted for 6,400 which is the second highest possible answer in your poll, and is higher than anyone else has voted, but if you read what many analysts are predicting, then 6,400 is certainly not overly bullish.

By omitting the higher answers from your poll, you introduce an expectation bias into the survey.

Date: 2011-01-14 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jane-somebody.livejournal.com
"By omitting the higher answers from your poll, you introduce an expectation bias into the survey."

I completely agree, though that could also be said of the lower numbers; however I understand that there is a rather low limit on the number of options that can be provided in this style of poll.

Date: 2010-12-31 06:22 pm (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
I'm feeling pessimistic, it seems.

Profile

wellinghall: (Default)
wellinghall

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 9th, 2026 01:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios