AKICOLJ (well sort of)
Jan. 4th, 2011 01:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Was there ever any merit whatsoever in On the Buses?
Does our car have a notice on it inviting overtaking drivers to cut in dangerously close, preferably without indicating?
Was there ever a book more riddled with inconsistencies than The Voyage of the Dawn Treader?
Why, when there are tens of thousands of waxwings in the country, have I still not seen one?
Are there any more questions I should be asking?
Does our car have a notice on it inviting overtaking drivers to cut in dangerously close, preferably without indicating?
Was there ever a book more riddled with inconsistencies than The Voyage of the Dawn Treader?
Why, when there are tens of thousands of waxwings in the country, have I still not seen one?
Are there any more questions I should be asking?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 02:10 pm (UTC)I do not know about the waxwings, but it is annoying me, too. I managed to see a couple of buzzards, a red kite, a couple of herons, a deer, and various small birds merely by sitting in the car between Yorkshire and Scotland, but have I seen a waxwing? I have not.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 03:13 pm (UTC)2a) I have long considered indicators to be an unnecessary gimmick fitted to vehicles to increase the cost. This is why so few people seem to use them. Said people seem to be irritated when someone else performs a manouever without signalling on them. A sign of our selfish times.
2b) Your car isn't invisible, you have the temerity to be in front of the impatient driver when he (I use he deliberately) has more right to the road than you. As soon as he is just in front, you no longer exist within his world and are forgotted.
3) Can't remember VOTDT although I read it years ago. How about anything produced by government or your local council.
4) Look for the guano on your car - that's them leaving a calling card whilst you weren't looking.
5) Your boss for a payrise or time off for good behaviour?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 03:53 pm (UTC)I can't speak for its merit, but I did once consider watching more than just clips of it when I was contemplating writing a paper on portrayals of trade unions in British sitcoms of the 1960s and 1970s. The paper never went anywhere, which I suppose is just as well.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 04:13 pm (UTC)They all do, that's what that funny yellow sign on the back is.
Undoubtedly.
Perhaps they see you first ;D
Why did you write this list of questions?
Ciao!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 04:24 pm (UTC)Not a lot.
It's invisible. You can only see it if you're an IQ of 60. Didn't you know that using your indicators wears the bulbs out.
Or one so badly structured?
I wish I knew. I haven't seen one either, and I've been looking.
Why? What? Who? When?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 05:56 pm (UTC)Not much (not exactly Frank Muir's finest hour). Annoying to think that there were more episodes of OTB than Fawlty Towers, I'm Alan Partridge and The Office combined. If I'm being charitable (and this is based on the wikipedia entry since I'm no expert), the depiction of an interracial relationship in series 3 was well ahead of its time for the early 70s.
The best solution to this problem is to accelerate, pull alongside the dangerous driver and use your car to ram his or her off the road. After you have done this, but before the car bursts into a ball of flame, pull the driver out and beat his head repeatedly against the bonnet of his inevitably crap car while instructing him or her loudly that he or she is a fuckweazel and that you are doing the country a service by removing defective genes from the gene pool. Annoyingly our nonsensical justice system treats the other person as the victim if you do this, so I can't really recommend it as a course of action.
Never read it. Narnia schmarnia.
I've never seen one either.
Yes.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 08:02 pm (UTC)I drive slowly so everyone cuts me up but in a landrover I don't care!
I really must reread the Naria series. It's been about 40 years!
The waxwings are giving me a wide berth too.
Can't think of any!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 08:15 pm (UTC)I still slightly resent not always being allowed Dangermouse as an exception :(
And while I'm at it, Blue Peter isn't what it used to be. Hmph.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 09:24 pm (UTC)Someone I talked to last month did think there was a grain of reasonableness to it in that ITV's children's offering at one time was not to the standard of the BBC's overall (e.g. more noisy cartoons & other fayre of often dubious overall quality, and of course adverts for toys, junk food and so on) so I see the parents' original point somewhat - I didn't like my lot watching children's TV with adverts in it either, nor too many versions of pow this and screech that without much plot, however obtained. There are several channels now available for that but also several with halfway decent children's offerings (I think, we're almost grown out of children's telly now. Again. Til I get the flu and watch some!) Now we hardly watch any ads anyway due to the wonder that is the PVR.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 09:23 pm (UTC)